Method, apparatus and data processor program product capable of enabling administration of a levels-based athleticism development program data

ABSTRACT

Various aspects of one or more methods, apparatuses and data processor program products capable of enabling management of data associated with an athleticism development program are disclosed herein. These various aspects include maintaining a database including subscriber performance data for a plurality of athleticism development program subscribers and facilitating preparation of a subscriber performance report for a specified one of the plurality of athleticism development program subscribers. The subscriber performance data is capable of enabling an attained standardized athleticism level to be determined for each one of the athleticism development program subscribers. The implementation of standardized athleticism levels is advantageous as it supports a measurable plan of progress for motivating a subscriber and trainer to meet their individual and mutual goals.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of prior filed U.S. application Ser.No. 12/566,444, filed on Sep. 24, 2009 which application is acontinuation of prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 09/965,338, filedon Sep. 27, 2001. Both applications are hereby incorporated byreference.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The disclosures herein relate generally to athletic and fitnessdevelopment programs and more particularly tone or more methods,apparatuses and data processor program products capable of enablingmanagement of athleticism development program data.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many people engage in fitness training routines with the intent andexpectation of achieving and/or maintaining a desired level ofathleticism. In some cases, such people are athletes who are no longeractively involved in a previous sport or sports. In other cases, suchpeople are not athletes per se, but do have a competitive spiritgenerally associated with athleticism and have a desire to improve theirlevel of fitness.

In each case, such people generally have a desire to both measure theirprogress against some defined standard and to assess the development oftheir fitness and athleticism among their peers in a competitiveenvironment such that the results of their hard work are recognized. Theassessment of their fitness and athletic development is a key motivatingfactor that positively reinforces their quest towards achieving and/ormaintaining their desired level of athleticism and fitness.

Self-directed general fitness activities facilitated via a health clubmembership or home gym are a common approach for engaging in a fitnesstraining routine. A facility such as a local health club or a home gymgenerally provides the equipment necessary to improve a person's levelof fitness. However, persons motivated by factors such as recognition oftheir hard work, competition among peers, assessment of their progressand often loose motivation as a result of the seemingly static measuresand limited feedback offered by activities and routines associated withtraditional fitness development programs and facilities.

It is not that the health clubs and home gyms do not provide theequipment or tools needed to develop an athletic level of fitness. But,the individual motivation and knowledge needed to develop and/or measurebalance from an athleticism perspective is often lacking. Consequently,at least a portion of health club members engage personal trainers.However, even when the training equipment is available and the knowledgefrom personal trainers is available, limitations associated withquantitatively assessing their athletic development and physical fitnessagainst a set of athletic fitness standards or against peers in aself-challenging and competitive environment still exists.

Research by American Sports Data, Inc. and The International Health,Racquet & Sports club Association (IHRSA) verifies that traditionalfitness development programs suffer from several limitations withrespect to developing a desired athleticism level, quantifying a desiredlevel of fitness and/or athleticism, and motivating one towards theirdesired athleticism level. One limitation is that traditional fitnessdevelopment programs are not based on standardized development levelsfor allowing comparative assessments between program subscribers or clubmembers. Another limitation is that there is no standard manner fordetermining an attained level of fitness and/or athleticism. Yet anotherlimitation is that there is no targeted and/or quantified feedback forleveraging a fitness routine in a manner that contributes to improving alevel of athleticism.

Accordingly, managing data associated with an athleticism developmentprogram in a manner that overcomes the limitations associated withtechniques for managing data associated with traditional fitness and/orathleticism development program is useful.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow chart view depicting a method capable of administeringan athleticism development program according to an embodiment of thedisclosures herein.

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view depicting an obstacle course (0-course) inaccordance with an embodiment of the disclosures here.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart view depicting a method capable of utilizing astation time to provide feedback relative to performance improvementsand deficiencies associated with individual stations of an 0-course,wherein the method is in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosures herein.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart view depicting a method capable of systematicallyfacilitating an athleticism development program in accordance with anembodiment of the disclosures herein.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart view depicting a method capable of determining anattained SAL of a subscriber in accordance with one embodiment of thedisclosures herein.

FIG. 6 is a diagrammatic view depicting a SAL minimum entry score tableaccording to an embodiment of the disclosures herein.

FIGS. 7A-7C are diagrammatic views depicting a subscriber performancereport for a particular subscriber according to an embodiment of thedisclosures herein.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart view depicting a method for managing athleticismdevelopment program data in accordance with the disclosures herein.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart view depicting a method capable of preparing aperformance report in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosuresherein.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram view depicting an apparatus capable ofcapturing, communicating and managing athleticism development programdata in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosures herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Various aspects of one or more methods, apparatuses, and data processorprogram products capable of enabling management of data associated withan athleticism development program are disclosed herein. These variousaspects include maintaining a database including subscriber performancedata for a plurality of athleticism development program subscribers andfacilitating preparation of a subscriber performance report for aspecified one of the plurality of athleticism development programsubscribers. The subscriber performance data is capable of enabling anattained standardized athleticism level to be determined for each one ofthe athleticism development program subscribers.

Standardized athleticism levels are referred to hereinafter as SAL's.The implementation of SAL's is advantageous as it supports a measurableplan of progress for motivating a subscriber and trainer to meet theirindividual and mutual goals. In one embodiment of the athleticismdevelopment program disclosed herein, the athleticism developmentprogram is based on seven different SAL's. These seven SAL's cover arange from Novice (Level 1) to Level 7. The athleticism developmentprogram provides subscribers with a means for progressing through agoal-oriented structure, gaining balanced fitness and athleticism asthey move through the various SAL's.

A number of factors contribute to administering an athleticismdevelopment program as disclosed herein being advantageous with respectto conventional fitness development programs. One factor is thatbalanced fitness and athletic development are capable of being achievedeffectively and efficiently. Another factor is that standardized andqualitative feedback is provided in a manner that enhances individualmotivation and contributes to the knowledge needed to develop balancedfitness and athletic development. Yet another factor is that athleticismdevelopment program subscribers (hereinafter referred to as subscriber)are provided with a means for testing improvements in their athleticdevelopment in a competitive environment. Furthermore, the attainedstandardized athleticism levels provide a means for the hard workrequired for achieving a particular standardized athleticism level to berecognized. Conventional fitness development programs are limited intheir ability to address these and other important factors in anefficient and effective manner.

The athleticism development program disclosed herein provides a means toimprove or maintain the components of physical and motor fitness throughsound, progressive, balanced and goal-specific physical and athletictraining. The SAL's provide subscribers with specific and quantifiedmeasures of development. Through the SAL's, subscribers are capable ofmeasuring, monitoring and developing a true comparable level of fitnessand athleticism relative to other subscribers.

Athleticism is defined herein as a balanced state of fitness incombination with an achieve level of physical performance at leastpartially resulting from such a state of fitness. Furthermore, it isdisclosed herein that athleticism may be determined by assessing variouscomponents of athleticism. Examples of such components of athleticismare included in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Component of Athleticism Description of Component Cardio Refersto both cardio respiratory and cardio-vascular Fitness systems. Cardiorespiratory refers to the efficiency with which the body delivers oxygenand nutrients needed for muscular activity and the transporting of wasteproducts from the cells. And, cardio-vascular refers to theeffectiveness of the heart and arteries to deliver blood to all parts ofthe body. Collectively cardio fitness provides greater respiratoryendurance and oxygen processing efficiency in a body. Muscular Thegreatest amount of force a muscle or muscle group can Strength exert ina single effort or in multiple efforts over a short period of times.Muscular The ability of a muscle or muscle group to perform repeatedEndurance movements with a sub-maximal force for extended periods oftimes. Flexibility The ability to move the joints (for example, elbow,knee) or any group of joints through an entire, normal range of motion.Agility The ability to employ motor functions in a fast coordinatedmanner demonstrating the application of speed and flexibility.

A method 100 capable of administering an athleticism development programaccording to an embodiment of the disclosures herein is depicted inFIG. 1. The method 100 includes facilitating standardized athleticismperformance evaluations at a block 102 and facilitating standardizedtraining set performance evaluations at a block 104. An athleticismlevel assessment as disclosed and referred to herein comprisesfacilitating a standardized athleticism performance evaluation andfacilitating a standardized fitness performance evaluation. The method100 further includes defining standardized athleticism levels at a block106. Maintaining dynamic subscriber performance standards is facilitatedat a block 108.

Maintaining dynamic subscriber performance standards is at leastpartially dependent on facilitating standardized athleticism performanceevaluations, facilitating standardized training set performanceevaluations and defining standardized athleticism levels. Facilitatingstandardized athleticism performance evaluations and facilitatingstandardized training set performance evaluations are defined herein asbeing capable of generating athleticism performance data. Dynamicsubscriber performance standards are defined herein as standardspopulated and updated with such athleticism performance data.

Determining attained SAL's for at least a portion of the subscribers isfacilitated at a block 110. Preparing subscriber performance reports isfacilitated at a block 112. Determining attained SAL's is at leastpartially dependent on facilitating standardized athleticism performanceevaluations, facilitating standardized training set performanceevaluations and maintaining dynamic subscriber performance standards.Preparing subscriber performance reports is at least partially dependenton determining attained SAL's. SAL's are an integral and a novel aspectof the disclosures herein. As discussed below in greater detail, SAL'sprovide a consistent and effective means for assessing and ranking theathletic development of subscribers.

Another novel aspect of the disclosures herein is the combinedimplementation of a training set performance evaluation and an obstaclecourse performance evaluation for determining a standardized level ofathleticism. The obstacle course is hereinafter referred to as the0-course. Through the 0-course performance evaluation and the trainingset performance evaluation, data (i.e. subscriber performance data)capable of enabling the standardized athleticism level of a subscriberto be determined is generated and captured.

The training set performance evaluation provides a means forquantitatively and individually assessing various aspects of physicalfitness that are related to athleticism. It is important to assess thesevarious aspects of physical fitness so that areas of improvement anddeficiencies in physical fitness can be identified. Furthermore, byassessing these various aspects of physical fitness, the respectivelevel of performance for these various aspects of physical fitness canbe tracked and analyzed. As discussed in greater detail below, ameasured parameter for each one of a plurality of training setperformance evaluation components is converted to a respective scoreused in determining the subscriber's attained SAL. Examples of suchevaluation components are present in Table 2.

The training set performance evaluation provides a means forquantitatively and individually assessing various aspects of physicalfitness that are related to athleticism. It is important to assess thesevarious aspects of physical fitness so that areas of improvement anddeficiencies in physical fitness can be identified. Furthermore, byassessing these various aspects of physical fitness, the respectivelevel of performance for these various aspects of physical fitness canbe tracked and analyzed. As discussed in greater detail below, ameasured parameter for each one of a plurality of training setperformance evaluation components is converted to a respective scoreused in determining the subscriber's attained SAL. Examples of suchevaluation components are present in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Evaluation Component Measured Parameter Resting Heart Rate Heatrate beats per minute Body Fat % body fat Push-Ups No. of repetitions inprescribed period of time Sit-Ups No. of repetitions in prescribedperiod of time Step Test Heat rate beats per minute Flexibility TestInches of stretch according to test method 1.5 mile Times Run Time tocomplete test T-Test Time to complete test 40-Yd. Sprint Time tocomplete

The 0-course performance evaluation provides a means for assessing thevarious components of athleticism in a competitive yet consistentsetting. FIG. 2 depicts an 0-course 200 in accordance with an embodimentof the disclosures herein. The 0-course 200 is suitable for enabling the0-course performance evaluation to be facilitated. The 0-course 200includes a starting station 202, a sequence of 0-course activitystations 204 and a finishing station 206. The sequence of 0-courseactivity stations 204 includes a plurality of cardio-intensive stations208 and a plurality of combined component stations 210. Thecardio-intensive stations 208 and combined component stations 210 areexamples of athleticism performance evaluation activities.

As discussed below in greater detail, the 0-course provides a means ofassessing the components of athleticism in a both composite andindividual manner. It is important to assess the various components ofathleticism in a manner to identify athletic development deficiencies.By assessing the components of athleticism in such a manner, performancerelating to the composite performance and to performance in variousstations of the 0-course can be tracked and analyzed. Examples ofstations capable of assessing certain components of athleticism and/orcombinations thereof are present in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Cardio Fitness 1. Sprinting across a prescribed distance 2.Riding a stationary bicycle for a prescribed distance 3. Walking on atreadmill for a prescribed distance 4. Climbing a prescribed number ofstairs on a stair stepper Muscular 1. Climbing a wall via a rope to aprescribed height Strength & 2. Climbing an inclined wall of aprescribed vertical Endurance height 3. Traversing a prescribed set ofoverhead bars 4. Pushing a weighted wheel barrel over a prescribeddistance 5. Climbing a hanging rope to a prescribed height 6. Climbing acargo net to a prescribed height 7. Performing a prescribed number ofpush-ups 8. Performing a prescribed number of pull-ups 9. Performing arope descent over a prescribed distance 10. Performing a prescribedlunges while carrying a weight Flexibility & 1. Performing a belly-crawlover a prescribed distance Agility 2. Traversing a prescribed set ofoverhead bars 3. Performing a rope descent over a prescribed distance 4.Pushing a weighted wheel barrel over a prescribed distance 5. Performinga cargo net to a prescribed height 6. Traversing an elevated balancebeam 7. Performing a prescribed lunges while carrying a weight 8.Jumping over a prescribed number of hurdles

As subscribers move through the various SAL's, they are introduced at adesignated SAL level to various different 0-courses. A first level0-course (e.g. the “White Course”) is designed to build confidence insubscribers. A second level 0-course (e.g. the “Red Course”) providesincreased athleticism and physical fitness relative to the first level0-course. A third level 0-course (e.g. the “Black Course”) provides theultimate challenge for the most fit and athletic subscribers, such asworld-class athletes, top fitness performers and certified personaltrainers. In each particular 0-course, the number of stations, thedifficulty associated with each station, and the difficulty associatedwith the combination of stations will dictate the level of theparticular 0-course. However, it should be understood that the 0-courseswill be designed and constructed in a standardized fashion such thatthere are not design and construction induced variability between0-courses at different locations.

In at least one embodiment of the 0-course performance evaluation, themeasure of performance is determined at least partially by an attainedcomposite time to complete all of the station of the 0-course in apre-defined sequential manner. Also, in at least one embodiment of the0-course performance evaluation, an attained station time required tocomplete each of the individual stations of the 0-course is captured andused to provide feedback relative to performance improvements anddeficiencies associated with individual stations. To this end, each0-course may include proprietary and/or commercially available devicesand systems that are capable of providing a time associated withcompleting an entire 0-course and/or times associated with completingeach individual station of an 0-course.

Table 4 below depicts a subscriber performance data table for thepush-up straining set performance evaluation component. The datacontained in this subscriber performance data table illustrates oneexample of subscriber performance data as disclosed herein. Similartables are generated for other training set performance evaluationcomponents and the 0-course performance evaluation. The age segments andlevel segments are administratively created and maintained with thetables being populated with actual subscriber performance data.

TABLE 4 AGE 17-21 22-26 27-31 22-36 37-41 22-46 27-51 22-56 27-65 LevelReps Reps Reps Reps Reps Reps Reps Reps Reps L7 75+ 76+ 73+ 68+ 65+ 61+58+ 51+ 44+ L6 60-74 61-75 58-68 53-63 50-61 47-58 42-52 36-45 28-37 L540-59 41-60 37-53 33-48 32-46 26-40 22-37 16-31 10-25 L4 20-39 21-4020-33 18-28 17-27 14-21 12-20 10-14 5-8 L3 10-19  9-20  8-18  5-15  6-15 5-14  4-13  3-10 2-6 L2 5-9 5-8 4-7 4-6 3-6 3-5 2-4 2-3 1-2 Novice <5  <5   <4   <4   <3   <3   <2   <2   <1  

In one embodiment of maintaining the subscriber performance data, thestandards for governing performance data tables will be based initiallyon normalized performance charts that are in popular use to evaluatefitness and/or athletic performance in schools; the military andresearch based organizations. Examples of such normalized performancecharts include those available from the Cooper Institute for AerobicResearch. As subscriber performance data is developed through theathleticism development program disclosed herein, the performance datatables will be populated exclusively with subscriber-specific data. Inthis manner, the standards and associated performance data tables willbe dynamic and will reflect the real athletic, physiological andpsychological changes that occur due to diet, exercising routines, lifestyle habits, health care, scientific developments, etc.

In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosures herein, FIG. 3depicts a method 300 capable of utilizing an 0-course station completiontime to provide feedback relative to performance improvements anddeficiencies associated with individual stations of an 0-course.Determining attained station times for at least a portion of thestations of the 0-course is facilitated at a block 302. After theattained station completion times are determined, an operation isfacilitated for determining one or more station-specific performanceassessments at a block 304. In at least one embodiment of determiningone or more station-specific performance assessments, such adetermination includes comparing at least a portion of the attainedstation completion times with baseline station times. In this manner,such an assessment is capable of determining whether a subscriber'sperformance at a particular station has improved or declined and,perhaps, to what degree. The baseline station completion times may bethat of a particular subscriber or that of a prescribed or selectedpopulation of the athleticism development program subscribers.

After determining the one or more station-specific performanceassessments, an operation is facilitated at a block 306 for determiningone or more station-specific fitness training routine recommendationsintended to address deficiencies in fitness and athleticism. An exampleof an athleticism training routine recommendation would be arecommendation to increase fitness training activities that enhancemuscular strength of the lower body. More specifically, such a fitnesstraining routine recommendation would specify that performing aprescribed number of squats or leg presses would aid in reducing theassociated deficiency.

Modifying a prescribed athleticism training routine in a manner capableof at least partially overcoming the athleticism deficiency is oneexample of addressing deficiencies in fitness and athleticism. Adding atleast one fitness training set exercise capable of at least partiallyovercoming the athleticism deficiency and/or adding at least one0-course stations capable of at least partially overcoming theathleticism deficiency illustrates means for modifying the prescribedathleticism training routine.

It is contemplated herein that each attained SAL may be associated witha respective one of a plurality of different O-course designs. Forexample a first set, a second set and a third set of the attained SAL'sare associated with a first O-course design, a second O-course designand a third O-course design, respectively. In this example, thedifferent O-course designs provide increasing level of challenge, thusproviding subscribers within the associated set of attained SACS anappropriate and sufficient challenge.

FIG. 4 depicts a method 400 capable of systematically facilitating anathleticism development program in accordance with an embodiment of thedisclosures herein. At a block 402, determining an initial attained SALis facilitated for each subscriber. Such an operation is important, asit allows each subscriber to be placed into the athleticism developmentprogram at a level consistent with his or her present level ofathleticism and/or fitness.

At a block 404, it is determined whether the particular subscriberproceeds directly to an O-course based athleticism development loop 406or to the O-course based athleticism development loop 406 via atraining-set exclusive athleticism development loop 408. For example, afirst set of attained SAL's may be associated with the training setexclusive athleticism development loop 408 and a second set of attainedSACS may be associated with the O-course based athleticism developmentloop 406. The training set exclusive athleticism development loop 408excludes an O-course performance evaluation and is intended to build thesubscriber's confidence and overall level of physical fitness, thuspreparing them for the performance challenge of loop 406.

In response to the subscriber's initial attained SAL resulting inplacement in the training set exclusive athleticism development loop408, the subscriber performs a current SAL athleticism training routineat a block 410. The current SAL athleticism training routine is definedherein to be an athleticism training routine consistent with thesubscriber's current level of athleticism.

Accordingly, in at least one embodiment of the disclosures herein,current attained SAL athleticism training routines associated with thetraining set exclusive athleticism development loop 408 focus on fitnesslevel without specific emphasis on O-course performance. It should beunderstood that the current attained SAL athleticism training routinemay be administered and/or developed by the subscriber, a trainer or theathleticism development program administrator. Furthermore, it iscontemplated and disclosed herein that the current SAL athleticismtraining routine may be one prepared by the athleticism programadministrator, a program affiliate, a trainer or a subscriber.

After performing at least a portion of the current attained SALathleticism training routine at the block 410, the subscriber performs atraining set performance evaluation at a block 412. An attained SAL forthe subscriber is determined at a block 414 after the subscribertraining set performance evaluation is completed. At a block 415, it isdetermined whether the subscriber has advanced to the next attained SAL.It should be understood that the subscriber may have progressed to ahigher attained SAL but is still within the training set exclusiveathleticism development loop 408. It should also be understood that anext attained SAL for a subscriber may not be the next incremental SALin a set of SAL's (i.e. the subscriber may have skipped one or moreSAL's).

If the subscriber has not advanced to the next attained SAL, thesubscriber continues with the current attained SAL athleticism trainingroutine at the block 410. In response to the subscriber advancing to thenext attained SAL, it is determined at a block 416 if the attained SALdetermined at the block 414 corresponds to the subscriber havingachieved an attained SAL suitable for advancing the subscriber to theO-course based athleticism development loop 406. If the attained SALdetermined at the block 414 does not advance the subscriber to theO-course based athleticism development loop 406, the subscriber performsthe next SAL athleticism training routine (at a block 417) correspondingto the newly attained SAL. The next SAL athleticism training routine isdefined herein to be an athleticism training routine consistent with thenewly attained SAL. It is contemplated herein that the next SALathleticism development program may be the same as or different from thecurrent SAL athleticism development program.

If the attained SAL determined at the block 414 does advance thesubscriber to the O-course based athleticism development loop 406, thesubscriber proceeds to the O-course based athleticism development loop406 at a block 418. It should be understood that progression to theO-course based athleticism development loop 406 from the training setexclusive athleticism development loop 408 is based upon the subscribermoving from an attained SAL associated with the training set exclusiveathleticism development loop 408 to an attained SAL associated with theO-course based athleticism development loop 406. At the block 418, thesubscriber performs the next SAL athleticism training routinecorresponding to the newly attained SAL. After performing at least aportion of the next SAL athleticism training routine at the block 418,the subscriber performs a training set performance evaluation at a block420 and an O-course performance evaluation 422. An attained SAL for thesubscriber is determined at a block 424 after the training setperformance and the O-course performance evaluations are completed. At ablock, 426, it is determined whether or not the subscriber has achievedthe next attained SAL based on results from the training set performanceevaluation and the O-course performance evaluation. If the subscriberhas achieved the next attained SAL, the subscriber performs the next SALathleticism training routine corresponding to the newly attained SAL atthe block 418. If the subscriber has not achieved the next attained SAL,the subscriber continues with the current attained SAL athleticismtraining routine at the block 428. Facilitating the various athleticismtraining routines disclosed in reference to FIG. 4 includes one or moreof the following: a plurality of training set exercises, at least onecardio intensive exercise and at least one athleticism performanceassessment component.

FIG. 5 depicts a method 500 capable of determining an attained SAL of asubscriber in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosures herein.The method 500 includes determining an achieved score for each one of aplurality of training set performance evaluation components (e.g.push-up test, pull-up test, 40 yd. Sprint, etc.) at a block 502 anddetermining an achieved score for an O-course performance evaluation ata block 504. After determining the achieved scores for the training setperformance evaluation components and the O-course performanceevaluation, determining evaluation-specific SAL levels for each of thetraining set and O-course performance evaluations is facilitated at ablock 506. The training set and O-course performance evaluations arejointly referred to herein as athleticism development evaluations. Byevaluation-specific, it is meant that each evaluation and/or componentsthereof has an associated score.

The attained SAL for the subscriber is determined by identifying thelowest of the evaluation-specific SACS at a block 508. It should beunderstood that the subscriber does not achieve the next attained SALuntil all of the evaluation-specific SACS are equal to or greater thanthe next attained SAL. For example, if the subscriber achieves the nextevaluation-specific SAL relative to a present attained SAL for theO-course performance evaluation and for 7 out of 8 training setperformance evaluation activities, the subscriber does not advance tothe next attained SAL. It is only after the subscriber achieves the nextevaluation-specific SAL for all of the training set performanceevaluations and the O-course performance evaluation that the subscriberadvances to the next attained SAL.

Determining the achieved scores associated with the training set andO-course performance evaluations includes converting achievedquantitative results associated with a corresponding performanceevaluation to a corresponding score. Determining the achieved scores foreach one of the performance evaluations at the block 502 includes anoperation 502A for converting one or more achieved times to acorresponding score, an operation 502B for converting one or moreachieved number of repetitions to corresponding scores and an operation502C for converting one or more achieved physiological measurement to acorresponding score. Determining the achieved score for the O-courseperformance evaluation at the block 504 includes an operation 504A forconverting an achieved O-course completion time to a correspondingscore. At the block 506, determining evaluation-specific SAL's for theathleticism development evaluations includes an operation 506A foridentifying one or more applicable SAL entry score table, an operation506B for associating attained performance evaluation scores to attainedminimum entry scores and an operation 506C for associating attainedscores to corresponding evaluation-specific SACS.

Examples of achieved quantitative values include an achieved time, anachieved number of repetitions and an achieved physiological parameter.The completion times for an O-course evaluation, a 1.5 mile timed run, a40-yard sprint and a T-test are examples of achieved times. The numberof repetitions for a push-up test, a sit-up test and pull-up test areexamples of achieved number of repetitions. The beats per minute of aresting heat rate measurement and percent body fat are examples ofachieved physiological parameters.

FIG. 6 depicts a SAL minimum entry score table 600 according to anembodiment of the disclosures herein. The SAL minimum entry score table600 is one of a set of SAL minimum entry score tables. The set of SALminimum entry score tables is segmented by subscriber attributes suchas, for example, gender and age.

The SAL minimum entry score table 600 includes a training set portion602 and an O-course portion 604. The training set portion 602 includesminimum entry scores for a plurality of training set performanceevaluation components. The O-course portion 604 includes minimum entryscores for a plurality of O-course deigns.

An embodiment of a scoring methodology for converting achievedquantitative results to a corresponding is disclosed herein. The scoringmethodology is based on a standard score of 1,000 points for a benchmarkperformance. Bonus points are awarded for bettering that performance andpoints are deducted for failing to achieve that benchmark. Embodimentsof scoring formulas are depicted below in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Type of Achieved Quantitative Result Scoring Formula Performancebased value where 1000 × (Target Number/Member Time). improvement isdenoted by (Target Number/Member Time) is a reducing an achieved valuerespective Scoring Factor. (e.g. O-course completion time) Performancebased value where (1000/Target Number) × member improvement is denotedby performance. increasing an achieved value (1000/Target Performance)is a (e.g. sit-up repetitions) respective Scoring Factor. Finite Value2000 − (Target Number × Scoring (e.g. body fat) Factor) Scoring Factoris determined administratively and represent a target number in the 80thand 90th percentile of subscriber results.

EXAMPLE 1

A 45-49 year-old female subscriber has an achieved time of 21:17 (1277sec) for a1.5 mile run test. A target number is of 1486 seconds isapplicable for a female subscriber in the age group of 45-49participating in the 1.5 mile run test. Accordingly, this subscriberwould receive a score of 1164 points (i.e. 1486/1277×1000=1163.6,rounded up to 1164).

Although not shown, minimum entry score tables for standard trainerperformance levels are contemplated and disclosed herein. Trainerperformance data is capable of being converted to corresponding scoressuch that each trainer associated with the athleticism developmentprogram may have a standardized trainer performance level associatedtherewith. In at least one embodiment of a method for determining theattained standardized trainer performance level for a trainer, themethod includes determining one or more attained score for a trainerperformance evaluation and correlating the one or more attained scorefor the trainer performance evaluation to an attained standardizedtrainer performance level. The trainer performance evaluation is capableof assessing a plurality of trainer performance evaluation components.Examples of such trainer performance evaluation components include anumber of trainer-trained subscribers, a percent retention oftrainer-trained subscribers, an average improvement in an attainedstandardized athleticism score for each of the trainer-trainedsubscribers, a composite score improvement for all of thetrainer-trained subscribers, a length of time at each level for each oneof the trainer-trained subscribers, a time to record fitness trainingrelated data, a time to enter O-course related data, and atrainer-effectiveness parameter.

FIGS. 7A-7C depict a subscriber performance report 700 for a particularsubscriber according to an embodiment of the disclosures herein. Thesubscriber performance report 700 is displayable on a visual display 701of a computer system or other type of visual display device of a dataprocessing device. The subscriber performance report 700 includes asummary page 702, a training set page 704 and an O-course. page 706. Thesummary page 702, the training set page 704 and the O-course page 706are each selectable by selecting a corresponding one of a plurality ofpage selectors 708. A SAL indicator 710 is displayed on the visualdisplay 701.

The summary page 702 includes a plurality of selectable comparisonpopulation fields 712, a plurality of selectable comparison criterionfields 714 and a submit button 715 for requesting preparation of thesubscriber report once the desired comparison population and comparisoncriterion are selected. The plurality of selectable comparisonpopulation fields 712 permit a desired group of program subscribers tobe selected for comparing results of the athleticism performanceevaluation or evaluations of the particular subscriber. The plurality ofselectable comparison criterion fields 714 permit a desired collectionof subscriber attributes to be selected for further refining the groupof subscribers against which the results of the athleticism performanceevaluation or evaluations of the particular subscriber will be compared.

Examples of the selectable comparison population fields 712 include oneor more fields that designate a subscribers at a respective fitnessclub, one or more fields that designate subscribers according to arespective geographical region, one or more fields that designatesubscribers according to a respective benchmark level of performance.Examples of the selectable comparison criterion population fields 714include a field that designates a range of subscriber ages, a field thatdesignates a subscriber gender and a field that designates a subscriberprogram background. Examples of a field that designates a subscriberprogram background include a field that designates a number of weeks inthe athleticism development program, a field that designates a number ofweeks at a particular SAL, a field that designates a level for a testset specific athleticism level and a field that designates a level foran O-course specific athleticism level.

In response to selecting a submit button 715 after the desiredcomparison population and comparison criterion are selected, a pluralityof ranking fields 716 are determined and displayed. Examples of theranking fields 716 include a field that designates an overall ranking ofthe particular subscriber relative to attained SAL, a field thatdesignates a ranking of the particular subscriber relative to trainingset performance, a field that designates a ranking of the particularsubscriber relative to O-course performance, a field that designates aranking of the particular subscriber relative to a designated time inthe athleticism development program and a field that designates aranking of the particular subscriber relative to a designated time at aparticular SAL. The rankings may be designated as a particular rankingrelative to the total number of subscribers in the comparisonpopulation, as a percentile of the total number of subscribers in thecomparison population, or both. A “More Information” field 718 may beassociated with each one of the ranking fields 716 for providingadditional information for each one of the rankings.

The training set page 704, FIG. 7B, includes a plurality of training setevaluation ranking fields 720 and a plurality of component comparisonfield 722. The training set evaluation ranking may be designated as aranking relative to the total number of subscribers in the comparisonpopulation, as a percentile of the total number of subscribers in thecomparison population, or both. In at least one embodiment of thetraining set page 704, the comparison population for the training setevaluation ranking fields 720 corresponds to a selected one of theplurality of selectable comparison population fields 712 on the summarypage 702.

Each one of the plurality of component comparison fields 722 compareresult of a training set evaluation on a component-by-component basisfor a current training set performance evaluation with respectiveresults for a reference training set performance evaluation. Acomparison selector field 724 enables a particular comparison referenceparameter upon which comparisons are based to be selected. Examples ofthe comparison reference parameter include a personal best (PB) resultfor each training set component, a result for a training set performanceevaluation on a designated date, etc.

A “More Information” field 726 may be associated with each one of theranking fields 720 and with each one of the component comparison fields722 for providing additional information for each one of the rankingsand comparisons, respectively. The “More Information” field 726 may forexample provide specific suggestions on exercise routines for improvingthe performance of the 722 components. Or, the “More Information” field726 may or could be a motivational comment indicating that one componentis very strong and suggesting that attention be paid to another toachieve the needed balance.

The O-course page 706, FIG. 7C, includes a plurality of O-courseevaluation ranking fields 728 and a plurality of station comparisonfields 730. The O-course evaluation ranking may be designated as aranking relative to the total number of subscribers in the comparisonpopulation, as a percentile of the total number of subscribers in thecomparison population, or both. In at least one embodiment of theO-course page 706, the comparison population for the O-course evaluationranking fields 728 corresponds to a selected one of the plurality ofselectable comparison population fields 712 on the summary page 702.

Each one-of the plurality of station comparison fields 730 compareresult of an O-course evaluation on a station-by-station basis for acurrent O-course performance evaluation with respective results for areference O-course performance evaluation. A comparison selector field732 enables a particular comparison reference parameter upon which thecomparison is based to be selected, Examples of the comparison referenceparameter include a personal best (PB) result for each O-course station,a result for an O-course performance evaluation on a designated date,etc. A “More Information” field 734 may be associated with the rankingfields 728 and with each one of the component comparison fields 730 forproviding additional information for the rankings and comparisons,respectively.

Although not shown herein, a trainer performance report and an affiliateperformance report are contemplated in accordance with an embodiment ofthe disclosures herein. Such trainer performance and affiliateperformance reports are similar in content and structure to thesubscriber performance report 700 disclosed above. Examples of datacontained in the trainer performance report include a number oftrainer-trained subscribers, a percent retention of trainer-trainedsubscribers, an average improvement in an attained standardizedathleticism score for each of the trainer-trained subscribers, acomposite score improvement for all of the trainer-trained subscribersand a length of time at each level for each one of the trainer-trainedsubscribers. An example of data contained in the affiliate performancereport includes an affiliate-specific ranking based on a weighting ofselected trainer performance data. Examples of such trainer performancedata includes number of trainer-trained subscribers, percent retentionof trainer-trained subscribers, average improvement in an attainedstandardized athleticism score for each of the trainer-trainedsubscribers, composite score improvement for all of the trainer-trainedsubscribers and length of time at each level for each one of thetrainer-trained subscribers. Such selected trainer performance datarepresents a weighting-based portion of the trainer performance data.

This type of data for trainer productivity enables an appropriate partyat a program affiliate to better evaluate the contribution of one ormore trainers and thus react more quickly to related issues that willimpact the clubs revenue. Similarly some of the affiliate data is beingprepared in a way (i.e. derived from the actual member activity anddevelopment results) that is unique and will allow the affiliate tomanage a customer-driven business based on one or more aspects of thedisclosures herein (i.e. athletic development) rather than a “feelsgood” approach. It is expected that this approach to measuring andutilizing trainer productivity will mesh with the goal-driven conceptsof the disclosures and facilitate a longer-term membership or asubscriber or program-related relationship between the subscriber andthe affiliate.

FIG. 8 depicts a method 800 for managing athleticism development programdata in accordance with the disclosures herein. An administrator datamanagement system facilitates managing a database 802. The database 802includes subscriber performance data 804, athleticism standards data806, trainer performance data 808, trainer level standards data 810 andprofile data 812. In at least one embodiment of managing the database802, managing the database 802 includes populating an athleticism levelstandards table 814 with at least a portion of the subscriberperformance data 804 for generating at least a portion of theathleticism level standards data 806. Similarly, in at least oneembodiment of managing the database 802, managing the database 802includes populating a trainer level standards table 816 with at least aportion of the trainer performance data 808 for generating at least aportion of the trainer level standards data 810. In this manner, eachtable is capable of being populated exclusively with the respectiveperformance data. It is contemplated herein that the database 802 maycomprise a plurality of relational or standalone databases.

O-course performance data 818 and training set performance data 820 areexamples of the subscriber performance data 804. The database 802 iscapable of receiving the O-course performance data 818 from an O-coursedata management system, from one or more trainer accessible dataprocessing devices or a combination thereof. The database 802 is alsocapable of receiving the training set performance data 820 from one ormore trainer-accessible data processing devices. Examples of thetrainer-accessible data processing device includes a trainer's computersystem, a computer system accessible to a trainer at an affiliatelocation (e.g. at a fitness club), a trainer's personal digitalassistant, a trainer's wireless telephone, etc.

The database 802 is capable of receiving the trainer performance data808 from one or more trainer-accessible data processing devices, fromone or more subscriber-accessible data processing devices or acombination thereof. Examples of the subscriber-accessible dataprocessing device includes a subscriber's computer system, a computersystem accessible to a subscriber at an affiliate location (e.g. at afitness club), a subscriber's personal digital assistant, a subscriber'swireless telephone, etc.

The database 802 is capable of receiving trainer profile data 822,subscriber profile data 824, and program affiliate profile data 826 fromone or more trainer-accessible data processing devices, from one or moresubscriber-accessible data processing devices and from one or moreprogram affiliate-accessible data processing devices, respectively. Theprofile data 812 comprises the trainer profile data 822, the subscriberprofile data 824 and the program affiliate data 826.

FIG. 9 depicts a method 900 capable of preparing a performance report inaccordance with an embodiment of the disclosures herein. Examples of theperformance report include a subscriber performance report, a trainerperformance report and an affiliate performance report. An embodiment ofa subscriber performance report is disclosed in reference to FIGS.7A-7C. An operation for preparing a request for the performance reportis facilitated at a block 902 using a requester-accessible dataprocessing device. Subscriber-accessible data processing devices,trainer accessible data processing devices and affiliate-accessible dataprocessing devices as disclosed herein are examples of therequester-accessible data processor system.

The request for the performance report is transmitted at a block 904from the request or accessible data processing device for being receivedby an administrator data management system. Performing steps such asselecting a comparison population and defining comparison criteria viaweb browser are examples of preparing the request for receiving theperformance report. An operation is performed at a block 906 forreceiving the request for the performance report.

In response to receiving the request, an operation for preparing theperformance report is performed at a block 908. The operation forpreparing the performance report includes receiving data from thedatabase 802 via an entry point A. The specific type of report beinggenerated will dictate the data received from the database 802. Inresponse to the performance report being prepared, an operation fortransmitting the performance report from the administrator datamanagement system for being received by the requester-accessible dataprocessing device is performed at a block 910. An operation forreceiving the performance report is subsequently performed by therequester-accessible data processing device at a block 912. Oneembodiment of receiving the performance report includes displaying theperformance report on a visual display of a computer via a web browser.

It is advantageous for various the various data and reports associatedwith the athleticism development program to be accessible via a computernetwork such as the Internet. In this manner, subscribers, trainers andaffiliates can readily access authorized information and publiclyavailable information. Accessing information via a computer networkprovides a means of accessing up-to-date athleticism performanceevaluation data, generating reports, making reservations for scheduledclasses obtaining various program documentation, etc.

FIG. 10 depicts an apparatus 1000 capable of capturing, communicatingand managing athleticism development program data in accordance with anembodiment of the disclosures herein. The apparatus 1000 includes acommunication network system 1010, a program administrator datamanagement system 1020, a program affiliate data management system 1030,an O-course data management system 1040, a subscriber data processingdevice 1050 and a trainer data processing device 1060. The programadministrator data management system 1020, the program affiliate datamanagement system 1030, the O-course data management system 1040, thesubscriber data processing device 1050 and the trainer data processingdevice 1060 are connected to the communication network system 1010 forenabling communication there between. At least a portion of the variousdata management systems and data processing devices are capable ofstoring athleticism performance data thereon, such as on a suitable datastorage device.

The program affiliate data management system 1030 includes a dataprocessing device 1032. The data processing device 1032 depicts anexample of a subscriber-accessible data processing device and atrainer-accessible data processing device. Examples of the dataprocessing device 1032 of the program affiliate data management system1030, the subscriber data processing device 1050 and the trainer dataprocessing device 1060 include a computer, a digital assistant, a wiredtelephone and a wireless telephone.

In at least one embodiment of the communication network system 1010, thecommunication network system 1010 includes a plurality of differenttypes of communication networks. Examples of the plurality of differenttypes of networks include, but are not limited to, wireless telephonenetworks, public switched telephone networks, data packet networks,computer networks and the like. The Internet is a specific example of acomputer network. The various networks of the communication networksystem 1010 are connected for enabling communication there between.

The O-course data management system 1040 includes a timing system 1042.The timing system 1042 is integrated within the O-course data managementsystem 1040 for allowing O-course completion and station times to becaptures. The timing station is capable of capturing times in anautomated manner such that a high level of timing consistency andaccuracy is maintained. It is contemplated herein that variouscommercially-available and proprietary timing systems are capable ofproviding the required timing functionality. Such systems may be basedon optical technologies, radio frequency technologies or other suitabletechnologies capable of providing the required timing functionality. Itis further contemplated and disclosed herein that a subscriber and/ortrainer identification system (e.g. a smart card) that would containpertinent personal and limited performance data on a chip, magneticstrip or other know type of device capable of enabling information to beaccessed by a data reading system. This data would be read (e.g.downloaded) to the O-course data management system 1040 when acorresponding subscriber or trainer visits a O-course or anotheraffiliate location so that the O-course data management system 1040 canbe updated, appropriate usage fees applied, etc.

Administration of an athleticism development program as disclosed hereinis capable of enabling a fitness experience more effective in terms ofrevenue for affiliates and trainers and in terms of results/value forsubscribers. One component for enabling the fitness experience to bemore effective for all parties involved is that standards are used forjudging the fitness and performance of subscribers and trainers asopposed to a nebulous perception of “fitness”. These standards providefor a measurable plan of progress for motivating a subscriber andtrainer to meet their individual and mutual goals.

The athleticism development program disclosed herein is cost-effectivefor affiliates. It increases their revenue, enhances their membershipretention and produces greater athletic development for their members.Another important and valuable aspect of the program is that it providesa complimentary relationship between non-associated fitness clubs, thusenhancing membership retention. The program is also fully capable ofbeing administered on a global level such that value to subscribers,affiliates and trainers is not limited by geographical boundaries.

The O-course portion of the program serves as a competitive element tothe program that can be used in a manner for evaluating and motivatingsubscribers on an individual, team, intra-club, inter-club and globalbasis. The training set portion of the program serves as a non-sportspecific athletic component that is configured to meet the needs ofathletes at all levels, ages and sex. In this manner, a balancedapproach to physical and athletic development is provided.

Accordingly, the specification and figures herein are to be regarded inan illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense, and all suchmodifications and their equivalents are intended to be included withinthe scope of the present invention. Benefits, other advantages, andsolutions to problems have been described above with regard to specificembodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems,and any elements that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution tooccur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as critical,required, or essential features or elements of any or all of the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method for managingathleticism development program data, comprising: receiving, at acomputing device having a processor and memory, subscriber-performancedata for a plurality of athleticism-development program subscribers,wherein the subscriber-performance data for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers comprises (1) a plurality ofathleticism performance-evaluation-quantitative results (“athleticismresults”) and (2) a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation-component-quantitative results(“training-set results”) corresponding to a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation components; storing thesubscriber-performance data in a database; determining, with theprocessor and memory, an athleticism-performance-evaluation achievedscore based on a subscriber-specific athleticism result of the pluralityof athleticism results for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers, wherein determining theathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score comprises convertingeach of the subscriber-specific athleticism results to a correspondingathleticism-set-performance-subscriber-specific athleticism score;determining, with the processor and memory, a training-set-performanceevaluation-component-achieved score based on a correspondingsubscriber-specific training-set result from the plurality of trainingset results for each of the plurality of athleticism-development-programsubscribers, wherein determining the training-setperformance-evaluation-component-achieved score comprises convertingeach of the subscriber-specific training-set results to a correspondingtraining-set-performance evaluation-component-achieved score;correlating, with the processor, theathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score and the trainingset-performance-evaluation-component-achieved score to an attainedstandardized athleticism level, wherein a score of at least theathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score and a score of atleast the training set-performance-evaluation-component-achieved scoreis associated with the attained standardization athleticism level; andfacilitating, with the processor, preparation of a subscriberperformance report for a specified one of the plurality of athleticismdevelopment program subscribers by providing the attained standardizedathleticism level for a comparison, wherein the subscriber performancereport includes the attained standardized athleticism level.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the subscriber-specific athleticism result isan achieved time.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein facilitatingpreparation of the subscriber performance report is initiated inresponse to receiving a request for preparing the subscriber-performancereport.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step ofdetermining a ranking of a presentathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score relative to apopulation of the plurality of athleticism-development-programsubscribers.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step ofpreparing a training-set performance-evaluation-component comparisonbetween a present training-set-performance evaluation and a referencetraining-set-performance evaluation.
 6. The method of claim 1, whereinattained standardized athleticism level is designated by a number. 7.The method of claim 6, wherein attained standardized athleticism levelnumber is an integer between two and seven.
 8. One or morenon-transitory computer storage media having computer-executableinstructions embodied thereon, that when executed by a computing systemhaving a processor and memory, cause the computing system to perform amethod for managing athleticism development program data, comprising:receiving subscriber-performance data for a plurality ofathleticism-development program subscribers, wherein thesubscriber-performance data for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers comprises (1) a plurality ofathleticism performance-evaluation-quantitative results (“athleticismresults”) and (2) a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation-component-quantitative results(“training-set results”) corresponding to a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation components; storing thesubscriber-performance data in a database; determining anathleticism-performance-evaluation achieved score based on asubscriber-specific athleticism result of the plurality of athleticismresults for each of the plurality of athleticism-development-programsubscribers, wherein determining theathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score comprises convertingeach of the subscriber-specific athleticism results to a correspondingathleticism-performance-evaluation achieved score; determining atraining-set-performance evaluation-component-achieved score based on acorresponding subscriber-specific training-set result from the pluralityof training set results for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers, wherein determining thetraining-set performance-evaluation-component-achieved score comprisesconverting each of the subscriber-specific training-set results to acorresponding training-set-performance evaluation-component-achievedscore; correlating the athleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved scoreand the training set-performance-evaluation-component-achieved score toan attained standardized athleticism level, wherein a score of at leastthe athleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score and a score of atleast the training set-performance-evaluation-component-achieved scoreis associated with the attained standardization athleticism level; andfacilitating preparation of a subscriber performance report for aspecified one of the plurality of athleticism development programsubscribers by providing the attained standardized athleticism level fora comparison, wherein the subscriber performance report includes theattained standardized athleticism level.
 9. The non-transitory computerstorage media of claim 8, wherein the subscriber-specific athleticismresult is an achieved time.
 10. The non-transitory computer storagemedia of claim 8, wherein facilitating preparation of the subscriberperformance report is initiated in response to receiving a request forpreparing the subscriber-performance report.
 11. The non-transitorycomputer storage media of claim 8, wherein the method further comprisinga step of determining a ranking of a presentathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score relative to apopulation of the plurality of athleticism-development-programsubscribers.
 12. The non-transitory computer storage media of claim 8,wherein the method further comprising a step of preparing a training-setperformance-evaluation-component comparison between a presenttraining-set-performance evaluation and a referencetraining-set-performance evaluation.
 13. The non-transitory computerstorage media of claim 8, wherein attained standardized athleticismlevel is designated by a number.
 14. The non-transitory computer storagemedia of claim 13, wherein attained standardized athleticism levelnumber is an integer between two and seven.
 15. A system forfacilitating management of athleticism development program data, thesystem comprising: a data processor; memory connected to the dataprocessor; and a data processor program, wherein the data processorprogram is capable of enabling the data processor to facilitate:receiving subscriber-performance data for a plurality ofathleticism-development program subscribers, wherein thesubscriber-performance data for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers comprises (1) a plurality ofathleticism performance-evaluation-quantitative results (“athleticismresults”) and (2) a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation-component-quantitative results(“training-set results”) corresponding to a plurality oftraining-set-performance-evaluation components; storing thesubscriber-performance data in a database; determining anathleticism-performance-evaluation achieved score based on asubscriber-specific athleticism result of the plurality of athleticismresults for each of the plurality of athleticism-development-programsubscribers, wherein determining theathleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score comprises convertingeach of the subscriber-specific athleticism results to a correspondingathleticism-performance-evaluation achieved score; determining atraining-set-performance evaluation-component-achieved score based on acorresponding subscriber-specific training-set result from the pluralityof training set results for each of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers, wherein determining thetraining-set performance-evaluation-component-achieved score comprisesconverting each of the subscriber-specific training-set results to acorresponding training-set-performance evaluation-component-achievedscore; correlating the athleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved scoreand the training set-performance-evaluation-component-achieved score toan attained standardized athleticism level wherein a score of at leastthe athleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved score and a score of atleast the training set-performance-evaluation-component-achieved scoreis associated with the attained standardization athleticism level; andfacilitating preparation of a subscriber performance report for aspecified one of the plurality of athleticism development programsubscribers by providing the attained standardized athleticism level fora comparison, wherein the subscriber performance report includes theattained standardized athleticism level.
 16. The system of claim 15,wherein the data processor program is capable of enabling the dataprocessor to facilitate the subscriber-specific athleticism result basedon an achieved time.
 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the dataprocessor program is capable of enabling the data processor tofacilitate preparation of the subscriber performance report in responseto receiving a request for preparing the subscriber-performance report.18. The system of claim 15, wherein the data processor program iscapable of enabling the data processor to facilitate determining aranking of a present athleticism-performance-evaluation-achieved scorerelative to a population of the plurality ofathleticism-development-program subscribers.
 19. The system of claim 15,wherein the data processor program is capable of enabling the dataprocessor to facilitate preparing a training-setperformance-evaluation-component comparison between a presenttraining-set-performance evaluation and a referencetraining-set-performance evaluation.
 20. The system of claim 15, whereinthe data processor program is capable of enabling the data processor tofacilitate the attained standardized athleticism level as beingdesignated by a number.
 21. The system of claim 20, wherein the dataprocessor program is capable of enabling the data processor tofacilitate the attained standardized athleticism level number as aninteger between two and seven.